A Detailed Analysis of Contemporary ARM and x86 Architectures

RISC vs. CISC wars raged in the 1980s when chip area and processor design complexity were the primary constraints and desktops and servers exclusively dominated the computing landscape. Today, energy and power are the primary design constraints and the computing landscape is significantly different: growth in tablets and smartphones running ARM (a RISC ISA) is surpassing that of desktops and laptops running x86 (a CISC ISA). Further, the traditionally low-power ARM ISA is entering the high-performance server market, while the traditionally high-performance x86 ISA is entering the mobile low-power device market. Thus, the question of whether ISA plays an intrinsic role in performance or energy efficiency is becoming important, and we seek to answer this question through a detailed measurement based study on real hardware running real applications. We analyze measurements on the ARM Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 and Intel Atom and Sandybridge i7 microprocessors over workloads spanning mobile, desktop, and server computing. Our methodical investigation demonstrates the role of ISA in modern microprocessors? performance and energy efficiency. We find that ARM and x86 processors are simply engineering design points optimized for different levels of performance, and there is nothing fundamentally more energy efficient in one ISA class or the other. The ISA being RISC or CISC seems irrelevant

Instruction set extensions for software defined radio on a multithreaded processor

Software dened radios, which provide a programmable solu-tion for implementing the physical layer processing of multi-ple communication standards, are widely recognized as one of the most important new technologies for wireless com-munication systems. Emerging communication standards, however, require tremendous processing capabilities to per-form high-bandwidth physical-layer processing in real time. In this paper, we present instruction set extensions for sev-eral important communication algorithms including convo-lutional encoding, Viterbi decoding, turbo decoding, and Reed-Solomon encoding and decoding. The performance bene ts of these extensions are evaluated using a supercom-puter class vectorizing compiler and the Sandblaster low-power multithreaded processor for software dened radio. The proposed instruction set extensions provide signicant performance improvements, while maintaining a high degree of programmability. Categories and Subject Descriptors C.3 [Computer Systems Organization]: Special-purpose and Application-based Systems|Real-time and embedded sys

A Multipurpose Embedded System Development Board

Digital systems, electronic circuit applications, and other courses in the\ud Swarthmore Engineering Department use various microcontrollers and\ud programmable logic devices in their labs and projects. The goal of this project\ud was to design a multipurpose board that could provide a single, cost-effective\ud replacement for the various boards used in these courses. This is achieved by\ud incorporating a MAX 7000S series complex programmable logic device (CPLD)\ud and a Motorola HC08 series microcontroller onto a single board. Extensive input\ud and output functionality is achieved with the inclusion of a USB controller, LCD\ud display, pushbuttons, dipswitches, LEDs, and various headers. Two design stages\ud were completed to produce a working MAX chip with various I/O devices, a\ud working Motorola chip, and a partially implemented USB controller. After a third\ud revision incorporating changes suggested in this report, the board is expected to\ud be fully functional and ready to be used in courses at Swarthmore

Power Struggles: Revisiting the RISC vs. CISC Debate on Contemporary ARM and x86 Architectures

RISC vs. CISC wars raged in the 1980s when chip area and processor design complexity were the primary constraints and desktops and servers exclusively dominated the computing landscape. Today, energy and power are the primary design constraints and the computing landscape is significantly different: growth in tablets and smartphones running ARM (a RISC ISA) is surpassing that of desktops and laptops running x86 (a CISC ISA). Further, the traditionally low-power ARM ISA is entering the high-performance server market, while the traditionally high-performance x86 ISA is entering the mobile low-power device market. Thus, the question of whether ISA plays an intrinsic role in performance or energy efficiency is becoming important, and we seek to answer this question through a detailed measurement based study on real hardware running real applications. We analyze measurements on the ARM Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 and Intel Atom and Sandybridge i7 microprocessors over workloads spanning mobile, desktop, and server computing. Our methodical investigation demonstrates the role of ISA in modern microprocessors ’ performance and energy efficiency. We find that ARM and x86 processors are simply engineering design points optimized for different levels of performance, and there is nothing fundamentally more energy efficient in one ISA class or the other. The ISA being RISC or CISC seems irrelevant. 1

An Overview of Reconfigurable Hardware in Embedded Systems

Over the past few years, the realm of embedded systems has expanded to include a wide variety of products, ranging from digital cameras, to sensor networks, to medical imaging systems. Consequently, engineers strive to create ever smaller and faster products, many of which have stringent power requirements. Coupled with increasing pressure to decrease costs and time-to-market, the design constraints of embedded systems pose a serious challenge to embedded systems designers. Reconfigurable hardware can provide a flexible and efficient platform for satisfying the area, performance, cost, and power requirements of many embedded systems. This article presents an overview of reconfigurable computing in embedded systems, in terms of benefits it can provide, how it has already been used, design issues, and hurdles that have slowed its adoption